Voice of the Kingfisher speaks out …from a different perspective
by Elinor Montgomery
March 18, 2010
The world is quickly being catapulted toward disaster; it would appear that there is very little anyone can do about it. As nation fights against nation to eliminate each other, they congregate into a union of nations bent on annihilating the very same nations that form the pact called the United Nations. Do oil and water mix? Does this unity of warring nations really have any political answers for enemies coming together to deal with the subject of peace, when the intention of one is to wipe the other from the face of the earth? How do you agree to such a plan when you are the object of annihilation?
You will note, if you have any sense at all, that the two skunks at the U.N. garden party are the nations Israel and the United States. Still, the skunks persist in thinking they can belong to this false peace package, which is no different from the one with which Hitler managed to fool Chamberlain. Such thinking nearly took England down in her own naiveté before the war ever started, had the stronger leadership of Winston Churchill not prevailed. And to think America hosts this monstrous organization on her own home territory – the very political package that aims to bring her down!
To top it off, the United States has elected for herself a man who openly declares he is a Muslim. But it is nothing short of double talk, for he also declares himself to be a Christian, although one with qualifications. He categorically states that Americans should not believe the truth of the Bible without which the Constitutions of Canada and the United States would not exist. And, to top that off, he declares Jesus to be a liar; Obama states, without hesitation, that there are other ways to heaven, which do not include Jesus.
And so, now you have an unworkable package in the United States that cannot produce a successful outcome between quality of leadership and United Nations ties. The present political condition spells disaster for the country, with the public, sleeping giant only now beginning to wake up. Whether or not it has been asleep too long remains yet to be seen.
And what can be said about the situation in Canada? Her U.N. ties are as undeniable as her enchantment with multiculturalism and her growing proclivity for handing over her autonomy to a forthcoming One World Order of Nations. The reason for Canada’s enormous appeal as a nation was her separation from the religiously-controlled nations of the world to run her own show under God’s truth and His Law, which resulted in her sharing a part in the land of liberty. This is all to say, until the law of man, the Charter of Rights, was introduced.
Because of the nature of these two nations, nursed and nurtured on the principles of the Bible, America has been the educator and bread provider for every troubled country in the world. She has never been an aggressive empire-builder and has only recently begun meddling in the politics of the rest of the religious world that does not stand on truth but rather on the unity of religion and state.
Never for a minute think that Atheism and Communism are not religions! Do not think that Christianity is not religion, though divided as it is into its different denominations of varying doctrines, all of which are divided, again, in their understanding of the Bible as a book of truth.
This past week a Communiqué came from Jim Hnatiuk, leader of the Christian Heritage Party, claiming that only they had the workable political package for all Canadians. His goal, as leader of the party, is to establish a new ‘party image’. He states that his party is by no means a private, religious group embedded in the political arena, and goes on to further state that it must move its readers beyond this incorrect perception. It is his belief that the party must begin to market itself. By this, I would assume that he is saying it must be perceived as being a little more of all things to all people in order to be elected, which is the slippery slope of politics.
Now, he wants the party to be known as CHP Canada rather than the Christian Heritage Party because the word Christian has received a bad rap? We must ask ourselves why he wants to now avoid that word, which is basic to the party’s structure. The one sure way to do that is to remove the name of religion from the name of the party, which they are trying to separate from religion if, in fact, it can be proven to not be a religious party.
Why not be straight forward and identify with our Canadian Heritage? This is what the Canadian majority wants, a people tired of being pushed around by everyone with religious rights, except the born-and-bred Canadians whose ancestors built this land, leaving for their descendants an inheritance of liberty.
Religion is the agent of Satan. Truth is the only foundation of the true church, which was apostolic and never Christian. Not once did either Jesus or the apostles use the term as the name for the church, nor did they endorse religion. The term was first used in Antioch, to mock believers of the Way and was later introduced as the name of a religious/state system established by Rome, an empire of the Babylonian System. Christianity began as plain and simple Romanism, full of many religious pagan practices of the Empire.
The apostle Peter warned about being called by such a name – to not allow it to interfere with the foundation of truth of the true church. It was a term of reproach under which the followers of the Way were reproached for the name of Christ. Peter advised them not to be shamed but to continue to glorify God, which could only be done by witnessing to His truth and not to religion (see 1 Peter 4:12-19). God is the God of truth (Deuteronomy 32:4, Psalm 31:5, Isaiah 65:16,), and His commandments are truth (Psalm 119:151); the Scripture is truth (Daniel 10:21) and truth, not religion, will set you free (see John 8:31-32).
The liberty of Canada rests on the truth of God and not in the religion of Christianity. Which part of his Christian package is it that Mr. Hnatiuk is trying to hide? Is it the Pope, the high priest of Roman Catholicism, who, having declared himself to be inerrant, has recently made overtures to Islam, all the while trying to keep hidden a corrupt priesthood’s homosexual crimes against children? Are they the titular heads of the Anglican Church, the Archbishop of Canterbury and the Queen, who are into Druidism right up to their necks? Or is it our own home-breed of Christian, which includes the one-time Moderator of the United Church, Bill Phipps, who declared Jesus was not divine – a nice man, maybe, but not divine?
The examples of Christian apostasy and corruption within institutional Christianity are unending, having named only a few of the hirelings who pose as shepherds. Yet Jesus said the gates of hell would not prevail against His church, so maybe Mr. Hnatiuk needs to take a closer look at Christianity before tying his political party to a system about to be crushed by the Rock. Is it any wonder that the name is not going to attract the public?
He should not be surprised that the name Christian has received a bad rap. I would not want any of these men ruling over me, nor do I want to endorse any institution, which is divided on its policies of supporting homosexuality, or is partaking in a larger unity of religions disguised as the purpose-driven church, such as Rick Warren and his ilk are promoting. The purpose-driven church is simply market-orientated for the seeker-friendly crowd without being so Biblical that the seekers might be offended. Is this what Mr. Hnatiuk is trying to emulate?
Which brand of Christianity is it that Mr. Hnatiuk claims gives his members their integrity seal? Were Pierre Trudeau, Jean Chrétien, Joe Clarke, and Paul Martin, along with all the other Prime Ministers not also Christians? Mackenzie King, though Presbyterian in name, was a spiritualist, globalist and tool of the Illuminati, and our U.N. peace promoter, Lester Pearson, also was deeply into the global picture of the Illuminati. These men were actually traitors to God and country; they all had the seal of Christianity upon them. Yet, they have been the very law-makers who inflicted the Charter of Rights upon Canada, the funding and the legalization of abortion and the special rights for that privileged group called homosexuals who practice an abomination in God’s eyes.
Why would our country want more of the same by electing men who are identified with the same Christian ‘integrity certification’? We are the only nation in the world, along with our partners, the United States, and ancient Israel, which have stood as governments on the truth of God and His Law in order to escape becoming a religious/state controlled nation like the other nations of the world. We have never been a government attached to a religious system, so why would we ever want to trust a religious party now?
The one package, which we might trust, would be a Canadian Heritage Political Party, which would stand on the only redemptive package for any nation that has been founded on the Word of God. There is no viable religious/political party that can take its place. The Christian Heritage Party can disguise itself with initials, but the fact remains that one cannot make a silk purse out of a sow’s ear by putting some colorful ribbons upon it. It will still be a sow’s ear.
The only workable political package is not a political package at all. It is the redemptive package of truth, which God has made available to all. We fools of mankind need to look only to Him, the Creator and Law Maker Who has given man the only workable government there is. Without His package there will be no peace. Our heritage rests on this.
It is apparent, by looking at the policies of CHP Canada that this party could well be the last hope for this country, if it is prepared to separate itself from liberal compromise, which is rampant in institutional Christianity. It cannot adopt the policies of the other parties by which it will compromise the truth in an effort to appeal to people of all faiths. Herein lies a huge difference between standing on truth and standing on religion.
The truth of Jesus Christ does not appeal to the multi-cultural crew, which has entered Canada and the United States mostly in the last thirty-five years. This is why Harper and Obama, as members of the school of double-talk, are able to get elected; it is what is called being all things to all people. They can be as religious as they like, saying, “I believe,” just as long as they do not clearly state what it is they believe.
Will CHP Canada be any different from the other political parties in this respect by trying to disguise who they really are, instead of taking a firm stand by declaring openly their separation from a religious/state system? It has no choice but to stand for our Canadian constitutional heritage in the truth of God’s Word and in Jesus Christ as Ruler over Canada, so that its platform is one with its representation.
This restricts lawmakers from having official prayers to any other god, of any other name. It means returning the Bible to our children in the classrooms, to the courtrooms and to our borders so that immigrants know they are coming to God’s country. It means an end to Charter law of rights and back to the Law of God. Is CHP Canada really able to go the route of a redemptive package and remain a religious/political party at the same time?
As the chairperson, speaking for the Voice of the Kingfisher, I want to clearly state that this is where we stand. We are not a religious system, nor are we man-made-institution-builders into fund-raising programs. We do not accept the bribes of government tax-dollar exemptions in exchange for silence on political matters of the utmost importance to this country. We pay Caesar what is Caesar’s and God what is God’s. We stand firmly on our apostolic roots of the true church witnessing only to truth and never to religion. We accept none of the world’s political packages, which are useless frauds in bringing about peace.
Surely, Mr. Hnatiuk, you know that only Jesus can usher in peace. When you reach this place of understanding, hopefully, you will switch from a religious/political package to a redemptive package. Then it might be said, in common language, that “You are cooking with gas”, and are standing for the real heritage of Canada, resting in the truth of God’s Word, the source for the only workable political package that there is.